← Search

Avi Berg

New York, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
137 matches · 72W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Avi Berg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history137 matches
L
2026-06-25 · Inglourious Backhands · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aravind Mohan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · Inglourious Backhands · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joshua Lappin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-28 · Inglourious Backhands · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Pina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-5
W
2026-04-27 · Inglourious Backhands · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Piccirillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-25 · Lee/Bruzat · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katie Cirella mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-03-22 · Lee/Bruzat · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amelie Bruzat mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-08 · Bhagwagar · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with JEHAN BHAGWAGAR
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-02 · Bhagwagar · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aravind Mohan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-19 · Bhagwagar · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Tang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-09 · Bhagwagar · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeraldine Gutierrez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-04 · Bhagwagar · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bianca Isabela Catoto mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-03 · Bhagwagar · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aravind Mohan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 46.7% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
80%
32W–8L · 59.7% of games
4.0
50%
4W–4L · 46.3% of games
7.0mixed
45.2%
19W–23L · 49% of games
8.0mixed
42.3%
11W–15L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
38 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert