← Search

Anthony Womack

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
132 matches · 67W–65L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Anthony Womack to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Ma.Roschel40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joe Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-26 · JMontague.6.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephen Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · An.Womack40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephen Mungenast
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-19 · Ma.Roschel40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joe Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-08-13 · Ka.Hagens40M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Struble mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-12 · JMontague.6.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joseph Williamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-07 · Ka.Hagens40M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa House mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Suzanne Brown / JP Phinney
2026-07-31 · Ka.Hagens40M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Kalinowski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-07-30 · An.Womack40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Spence Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
Daniel Allen / Galen Howlett
2026-07-12 · JMontague-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Ratliff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-26 · Ka.Hagens40M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alison Kalinowski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-06-21 · JMontague-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanner Dellinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
60.4%
29W–19L · 52.1% of games
4.0
20%
4W–16L · 37.4% of games
6.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 51.8% of games
7.5
44.8%
13W–16L · 49% of games
3.5mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 53.5% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 55.7% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 54.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
39 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams