← Search

Deraymes Harris

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
159 matches · 108W–51L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Deraymes Harris to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history159 matches
L
2026-08-26 · JByrd.6.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dennis Byrd Jr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-23 · De.Byrd18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Andrew Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-23 · JByrd.7.5C-DUR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bharath Dheekonda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-08-22 · TOC.Byrd · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Frazer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · TOC.Byrd · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-16 · De.Byrd18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Andrew Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-15 · TOC.Byrd · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Luke Stillson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-12 · JByrd.6.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Dennis Byrd Jr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-10 · TOC.Byrd · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-09 · De.Byrd18C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pearson Wynands
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · TOC.Byrd2 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bharath Dheekonda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-22 · TOC.Byrd2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Srivatsan Ramesh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
77%
67W–20L · 60.9% of games
4.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 39% of games
6.5
68.2%
15W–7L · 53% of games
7.5
66.7%
14W–7L · 55.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
25 matches
#2 Singles
12%
19 matches
#1 Singles
6%
9 matches
#3 Singles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams