← Search

Jane Emmerth

Hoover, AL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 30W–27L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Jane Emmerth to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Greystone Y - Wilson-Gammill · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sherry Butler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-08 · BHRC - Schaper · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gorgeana Wilkerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-09-03 · Greystone Y - Wilson-Gammill · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenni Falkner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-19 · Inverness CC - Rudder · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mallory Carrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-13 · ICC - Emmerth · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kristin Prickett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-05 · Inverness CC - Rudder · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gena Gorman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · ICC - Emmerth · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lauren Sisler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-28 · Inverness CC - Rudder · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mallory Carrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-07-23 · Inverness CC - Rudder · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lori Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · Inverness CC - Rudder · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melissa Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-09 · Inverness CC - Rudder · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Kozlowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-02 · Inverness CC - Rudder · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Cindy Hodo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
61.8%
21W–13L · 52% of games
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 46% of games
5.5
20%
1W–4L · 33.7% of games
6.5
50%
6W–6L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 53% of the time
#3 Doubles
53%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe