← Search

Ali Rutledge

Hoover, AL
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 21W–20L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Ali Rutledge to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
W
2026-08-21 · HCC - Cox/Talley · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Dane Hoven
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-13 · HCC - Cox/Talley · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Michelle Watts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-30 · HCC - Cox/Talley · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Dane Hoven
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-16 · HCC - Cox/Talley · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lindsey Tessin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-09 · HCC - Cox/Talley · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Ashley Goetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-10 · HCC - Loudermilk · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Laura Catherine Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-20 · HCC - Loudermilk · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lindsey DeRieux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-05-13 · HCC - Loudermilk · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-12 · HCC - Cox · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Melissa Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-02-10 · HCC - Cox · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Laura Catherine Mason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-10 · Hoover C. Club - Loudermilk/Waites · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimber Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-01-23 · Hoover C. Club - Loudermilk/Waites · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lani McFadden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
50%
17W–17L · 50.4% of games
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 66.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
18 matches
#1 Singles
22%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert