← Search

Lauren Aiyer

— year-end
71 matches · 34W–37L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Lauren Aiyer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-06-10 · MTC - Huettemann/Kennedy · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Phillippi Pyles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · MTC - Huettemann/Kennedy · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melissa Hannahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-28 · Spirit Park - Harrell-Wyse Tri 18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Hartley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-19 · Spirit Park - Harrell-Wyse Tri 18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Hartley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-03-04 · MTC - Terrell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucy Grove
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
Katie Ward / Leslea Wallis
2026-03-03 · MTC - Huber · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jan Fontenot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-02-25 · MTC - Terrell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Hannahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-03 · MTC - Huber · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alice Huber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-01-28 · MTC - Terrell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amanda Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-27 · MTC - Huber · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristine Wnuk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-01-20 · MTC - Huber · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-01-13 · MTC - Huber · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jan Fontenot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
76%
19W–6L · 66.4% of games
3.5
0%
0W–12L · 36% of games
6.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 55.1% of games
3.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 60.4% of games
3.5mixed
15.4%
2W–11L · 38.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
18 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova