← Search

Cathy Hilpert

Mobile, AL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 16W–13L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Cathy Hilpert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
W
2026-06-11 · MTC - Grimes/Hester · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Mathison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-05-28 · MTC - Grimes/Hester · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Beth Mathison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-27 · MTC - Grimes · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Lisa Warren / Rebecca Pope
2026-03-30 · MTC - Grimes · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Mathison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-19 · MTC - Cooper (Tri) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Porter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-08 · MTC - Grimes · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Pope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-23 · MTC - Cooper (Tri) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jean Hernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-22 · MTC - Grimes · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Pope
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-09-29 · MTC - Grimes/Hester 40 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-09-23 · OW - Kendall · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laurel Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Alice Huber / Yen Nguyen
2025-09-16 · OW - Kendall · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Mathison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-09-09 · OW - Kendall · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jean Hernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 61.7% of games
3.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 39.6% of games
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 54.3% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#1 Singles
21%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King