← Search

Janette Cunningham

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
293 matches · 133W–160L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janette Cunningham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history293 matches
L
2026-09-08 · PW.Hulbert · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patti Hulbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-01 · PW.Hulbert · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patti Hulbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · PW.Fitzgerald · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kathryn Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-25 · PW.Hulbert · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patti Hulbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-18 · PW.Hulbert · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-11 · PW.Hulbert · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patti Hulbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-10 · PW.Fitzgerald · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leah Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-08-04 · PW.Hulbert · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patti Hulbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · with Julie Durand championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-27 · Mi.Fitzgerald55A · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Orlandini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-04-24 · MFitzgerald-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Durand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-04-17 · MFitzgerald-DUR · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Durand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
57.4%
89W–66L · 52.8% of games
4.0
16.7%
4W–20L · 36.1% of games
6.5
44.2%
23W–29L · 48.3% of games
7.5
23.1%
12W–40L · 39% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
101 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
98 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
79 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches
#3 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams