← Search

Helen Harris

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
185 matches · 113W–72L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Helen Harris to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history185 matches
W
2026-08-31 · Ja.Terrell55C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andra Kinlaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · Ra.Mills40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kimberley Matthews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-11 · Ra.Mills18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joy Horovitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-10 · Ja.Terrell55C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andra Kinlaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
N/A
2026-08-03 · Sp.Busby18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Breazeale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-29 · Ro.Hatlen55M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mitch Strobin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-27 · Sp.Busby18T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Breazeale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-15 · Ro.Hatlen55M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Osborn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-07 · Mi.Strobin55M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Brinckerhoff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-01 · Ro.Hatlen55M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mitch Strobin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-30 · Mi.Strobin55M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Tombs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · Sp.Busby18T · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Rachel Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
69.1%
47W–21L · 56.5% of games
4.0
30.4%
7W–16L · 43.5% of games
7.5
65.1%
28W–15L · 56.4% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 54.3% of games
4.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46.4% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 50.8% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
65 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
54 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams