← Search

Bernardo Llerenas

Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
46 matches · 14W–32L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Bernardo Llerenas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history46 matches
L
2026-09-07 · SSofsian (PCC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Bronson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-27 · JMarks (Providence CC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jim Marks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-24 · SSofsian (PCC) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mark Richards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-19 · JMarks (Providence CC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alec Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-29 · JMarks (PCC) · #3 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Adrian Mendoza
2026-06-14 · JMarks (PCC) · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-30 · JMarks (PCC) · #3 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-30 · JMarks (Providence CC) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chris Tomlinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-21 · CWebb (Providence CC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-16 · JMarks (Providence CC) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Randall Maddle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-14 · CWebb (Providence CC) · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-04-09 · JMarks (Providence CC) · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.4% of games
4.5
10.5%
2W–17L · 38.1% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5
47.1%
8W–9L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#1 Singles
13%
6 matches
#3 Singles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match
#3 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova