← Search

Jim Marks

Charlotte, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 19W–34L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jim Marks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
W
2026-09-03 · JMarks (Providence CC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brad VanHoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-27 · JMarks (Providence CC) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bernardo Llerenas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-21 · JMarks (Providence CC) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brad VanHoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-19 · JMarks (Providence CC) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michal Jarzynski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-17 · MJarzynski/BShamanis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Alec Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-13 · JMarks (Providence CC) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jeff Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · JMarks (PCC) · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-21 · JMarks (PCC) · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-01 · PKartes/Maddle (Mountainbrook) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Randall Maddle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-29 · JMarks (PCC) · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-24 · PKartes/Maddle (Mountainbrook) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Norm Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-22 · JMarks (PCC) · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.5
22.2%
6W–21L · 40.2% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 53.3% of games
8.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#1 Singles
17%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
8 matches
#2 Singles
9%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova