← Search

Emily Manders

Framingham, MA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 10W–24L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emily Manders to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
L
2026-05-18 · SHR:Shrewsbury:Pulnik · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robin Ziko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-19 · LFW:Wayland:Taunton Rigby/Corton · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-12-12 · LFW:Wayland:Taunton Rigby/Corton · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ivan Loukovnikov mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-10-31 · LFW:Wayland:Taunton Rigby/Corton · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-10-03 · LFW:Wayland:Taunton Rigby/Corton · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randy Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-14 · LFNT:Team Awesome:Pollack · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Breger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-08-01 · LFNT:Team Awesome:Pollack · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Lilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-17 · LFNT:Team Awesome:Pollack · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alison Taunton-Rigby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-08-22 · LFNT Team Awesome:Pollack · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Kountz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-5, 0-1
L
2024-08-07 · LFNT Team Awesome:Pollack · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Kountz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-07-11 · LFNT Team Awesome:Pollack · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Kountz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-1, 1-0
L
2023-08-08 · LFNT:Longfellow Natick:Pollack · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Kountz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
28%
7W–18L · 41.7% of games
8.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams