Elizabeth Ratcliffe
KESWICK, VA
27 matches · 16W–11L · seasons 2021–2026
Captains: add Elizabeth Ratcliffe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history27 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
Lauren Riddick / Anne Barger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
Marcella Miller / Eva Simmons-O'Brien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
Nancy Row / Gail Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W
Mary Voelmle / Kimberly Monroe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 49.7% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 59% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 53.2% of games
8.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 44% of the time
#2 Doubles
44%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
41%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.