← Search

Mary Voelmle

Charlottesville, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
250 matches · 149W–101L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Voelmle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history250 matches
W
2026-09-09 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julia Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-08 · BHSC - Davis · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tim Grossman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · BHSC - Davis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tim Grossman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
L
2026-08-22 · BHSC - Lerner - Sister-Love · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allie Bryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-12 · BHSC - Lerner - Sister-Love · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · BHSC - Davis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Omar Garriott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-05 · BHSC - Lerner - Sister-Love · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Stephenson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-29 · BHSC - Lerner - Sister-Love · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tamara Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-24 · BHSC - Fairborn · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lorenzo Davis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · Keswick - Moore · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
Maureen Fox / Kim Miller
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Belinda Bullock championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
81.2%
26W–6L · 62.7% of games
4.0
48.8%
40W–42L · 49.9% of games
6.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 60% of games
7.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 55.3% of games
8.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.8% of games
7.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 62.3% of games
7.5mixed
80.6%
25W–6L · 63.4% of games
8.0mixed
56.8%
25W–19L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
68 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
46 matches
#1 Singles
14%
36 matches
#2 Singles
12%
30 matches
#3 Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal