← Search

Tracy Bourque

Centennial, CO
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
238 matches · 97W–141L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tracy Bourque to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history238 matches
W
2026-08-18 · LTFC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-04 · LTFC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-30 · LTFC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leigh Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · LTFC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Mary Murray / Kay Roesch
2026-07-14 · LTFC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Gaibor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · LTFC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Myers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-07 · LTFC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-0
L
2026-07-02 · LTFC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Parks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-25 · LTFC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leigh Dunn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · LTFC ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Gaibor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-09 · LTFC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Selket Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-31 · LTFC RED · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lance Bourque mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
66.7%
22W–11L · 58.2% of games
4.0
34.8%
47W–88L · 44.6% of games
7.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 54.4% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 46.4% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
15W–25L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
79 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
51 matches
#1 Singles
15%
36 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer