← Search

Kay Roesch

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
191 matches · 113W–78L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kay Roesch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history191 matches
W
2026-08-23 · WP GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Mayer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-22 · WP GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Mayer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-26 · WP GREEN · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Almanza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-22 · SS-H ORANGE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Inge Bentz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · WP GREEN · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Mayer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-14 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · SS-H ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lissa Moon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-12 · SS-LGT NAVY · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-05 · SS-LGT NAVY · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Catherine Corbett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Hallowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
70.3%
52W–22L · 56% of games
8.0
53.1%
26W–23L · 52.6% of games
7.5mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 47.7% of games
8.0mixed
53.8%
14W–12L · 52% of games
8.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
61 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
57 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova