← Search

Lauren King Saatkamp

— year-end
24 matches · 17W–7L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Lauren King Saatkamp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
W
Elaine Lee / Trudy Sullivan
2026-04-29 · Fisher/Bailey/Nashville · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-08 · Fisher/Bailey/Nashville · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Vane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-07 · Goodrich/Nashville · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-03 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-02 · Schneider/Vestevich/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Camping
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-31 · Goodrich/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elisa Goodrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-18 · Fisher/Bailey/Nashville · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with NICOLE BATEMAN
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-17 · Goodrich/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lissa Vestevich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-11-17 · Thoma/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicky Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-10 · Thoma/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Cooley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-03 · Thoma/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Cooley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-13 · Thoma/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Teams8 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 59% of games
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 54.3% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 63.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
3 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
3 matches
#1 Singles
8%
2 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert