← Search

Laura Woodard

— year-end
76 matches · 54W–22L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Laura Woodard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
W
2026-08-11 · Osborne/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sara Ludlam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-06 · Hillwood CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emerson Scales
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-23 · Hillwood CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sara Ludlam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-16 · Hillwood CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-15 · Osborne/Nashvile · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Ludlam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · Osborne/Nashvile · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Ludlam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-09 · Hillwood CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Alden Brett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · Osborne/Nashvile · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Carla Grillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · Browder/Kirkland/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kyle McCarthy Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · Hillwood CC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-24 · Osborne/Nashvile · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Ludlam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · Hillwood CC · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Noble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams19 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 67.9% of games
3.0
70.6%
36W–15L · 56.4% of games
3.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 47.3% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
18 matches
#1 Singles
16%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
8 matches
#2 Singles
7%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams