← Search

Jennifer Nazaire

Ellicott City, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 22W–31L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Nazaire to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-05-30 · Cook Auerbach - Grube · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Baxter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-4
L
2026-05-03 · Eyman - AD-INtentions 18+ 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-27 · Battista - Net Setters 18+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Hagen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-17 · Battista - Net Setters 18+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Battista
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-14 · mccullough - Single Bounce 3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-08-18 · Grube 55 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jean Flack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-08-02 · Grube 55 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carolle Marie Oneil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-3
W
2025-07-17 · Grube 55 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Cullison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-06-24 · Wertman - Super Smash 40+ 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2025-06-16 · Wertman - Super Smash 40+ 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelly Frederick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-10 · Keeny · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2025-06-05 · Wertman - Super Smash 40+ 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
39.5%
15W–23L · 46% of games
7.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.4% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe