← Search

Sherry Houff

— year-end
24 matches · 13W–11L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Sherry Houff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2026-05-03 · Oaksmith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Targonski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-27 · Oaksmith · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Ruskin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-17 · Oaksmith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Targonski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-06 · Oaksmith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Targonski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
Samantha Norris / Kelsey Forbes
2025-10-02 · Oaksmith · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachael Mott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-5
L
2025-09-10 · Oaksmith · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joan Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Stephanie Heinrichs / Sarah Boyd
2025-05-14 · Team Molz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marian Boring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-05-07 · Team Molz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Targonski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-28 · Oaksmith · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashling Pollard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2025-04-24 · Oaksmith · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gena Conron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-03-31 · Oaksmith · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Targonski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2024-05-16 · Molz · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Targonski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Teams13 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
59.1%
13W–9L · 51.9% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
38%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert