← Search

Nash Dean

— year-end
87 matches · 54W–33L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nash Dean to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
L
2026-08-16 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Dan Weisman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Camilo Fita championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-10 · HCC Tigers/Espinoza · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ross van Boven
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-01 · HCC Tigers/Espinoza · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ross van Boven
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-11 · HCC Tigers/Espinoza · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Logan Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-27 · HCC Tigers/Espinoza · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andrew Orme
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-02 · Alachua/Schafer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Camilo Fita
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · Alachua/Schafer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Austin Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2023-08-13 · SPTC The Hit Squad · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nick Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Brian Hodapp / David Palmer
2023-07-29 · SPTC The Hit Squad · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Pedro Franco Byrne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-06-11 · SPTC Holliday 8.0 X · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christine Hammerschmidt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
Teams17 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
61.9%
13W–8L · 52.6% of games
7.5
70%
14W–6L · 55.9% of games
8.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 59% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 57.3% of games
9.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
16 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer