← Search

Logan Wrigley

— year-end
23 matches · 16W–7L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Logan Wrigley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history23 matches
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Richard Rahde championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Richard Rahde championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Richard Rahde championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-12 · Honey Badger · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-03-07 · Honey Badger · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carl Neve
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-02-26 · Honey Badger · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hayden Bos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-21 · Honey Badger · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Lutz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-02-12 · Honey Badger · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Griffith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-01-29 · Honey Badger · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Rahde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-10-16 · Purple-Bos · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carl Neve
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Adam Jones / Tim Roelofs
2025-10-02 · Purple-Bos · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Carl Neve
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-09-30 · Purple-Bos · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hayden Bos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Teams4 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
82.4%
14W–3L · 61% of games
7.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
11 matches
#1 Singles
22%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams