← Search

JJ Amaya

BOUNTIFUL, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 42W–60L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add JJ Amaya to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history102 matches
W
2026-08-21 · Buttcaps · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ellie Flowers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-08-14 · Eccles-Patrick · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Catherine van Uitert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-08 · Buttcaps · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Ellie Flowers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · Eccles-Patrick · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Haley H Moreno mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
Rachel Kincheloe / Eric Hallingstad
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Heather Evans championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Heather Evans championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Heather Evans championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Quinn Pritchett championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
Stephen Thompson / Brady Rasmussen
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Remi Barron championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Christopher Bratcher championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Heather Evans championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · with Keaton Mathis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
45.2%
19W–23L · 47.6% of games
4.5
0%
0W–8L · 31.4% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.2% of games
8.5mixed
35%
7W–13L · 44.3% of games
9.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 37.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
25 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Male Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert