← Search

Jamie Evans

Victorville, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 39W–35L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jamie Evans to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
L
2026-09-12 · IE-Canyon Crest-Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Noriko Hanawa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-01 · IE-Canyon Crest-Johnson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christie Boniface
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-25 · IE-Bear Valley-Mejia · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Sharpe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-19 · IE-Bear Valley-Mejia · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Mejia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · IE-Bear Valley-Mejia · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Mejia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-05 · IE-Bear Valley-Mejia · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Sharpe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-27 · IE-LLW-CCCC-Kay · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cilla Horta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · IE-Bear Valley-Mejia · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Mejia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-14 · IE-LLW-CCCC-Kay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Giles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-07 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Samp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · IE-LLW-CCCC-Kay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Hebert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
59.1%
13W–9L · 56.8% of games
4.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 45.6% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 58.1% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
23 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova