← Search

Janet Giles

Moreno Valley, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 62W–38L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Janet Giles to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
W
2026-07-25 · IE-CCCC-Kay · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · IE-LLW-CCCC-Kay · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Theresa Winterburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-05 · IE-LLW-CCCC-Kay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Theresa Winterburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-06-27 · IE-LLW-CCCC-Kay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Theresa Winterburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Theresa Winterburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-20 · IE-LLW-CCCC-Kay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Theresa Winterburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-14 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Theresa Winterburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-14 · IE-LLW-CCCC-Kay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jamie Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-07 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Nofsinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-31 · IE-CCCC-Kay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Theresa Winterburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-30 · IE-CCCC-Hebert · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Theresa Winterburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-24 · IE-CCCC-Kay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Theresa Winterburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
63.6%
21W–12L · 55.6% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 37.3% of games
7.0
75%
21W–7L · 57.6% of games
8.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 50% of games
0.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 58.1% of games
7.0mixed
41.7%
5W–7L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
22 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert