← Search

Glen Medina

Frederick, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
227 matches · 91W–136L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Glen Medina to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history227 matches
W
2026-08-31 · AP's Slayers 7.5Fun · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Keefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · Kozliak 40+7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angela Sharma mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · Kozliak 40+7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Maiden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-21 · Kozliak 40+7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angela Sharma mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-11 · Kozliak 40+7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Maiden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
Sarah Baker / Sithisak Sutsakhan
2026-07-01 · Kozliak 40+7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Maiden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · Hitmen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Neuman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-16 · Hitmen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Neuman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-5
L
2026-05-11 · Rian 18+ 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bradley Jacques
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-09 · Hitmen · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Neuman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4
L
2026-05-09 · Rian 18+ 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicholas Roselius
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-25 · Hitmen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Neuman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 43.5% of games
4.0
40.4%
40W–59L · 45.8% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 43.1% of games
4.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 41.7% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
12W–15L · 51.1% of games
7.5mixed
60%
9W–6L · 49.6% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
15W–30L · 42.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
96 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
61 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer