← Search

Abhishek Saxena

Washington, DC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
62 matches · 38W–24L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Abhishek Saxena to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
W
2026-05-31 · Rogers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jose MacAranas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-30 · Well Strung · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Demetrius Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · Rogers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geoffrey Montgomery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-03 · Well Strung · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Zehr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-25 · Rogers · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geoffrey Montgomery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-01-11 · Rogers · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Baily
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-06 · #4 Doubles · with Richard Sexton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-25 · Well Strung · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with FAUSTINO SANCHEZ
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-06-22 · Well Strung · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with J Nathan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-06-21 · Well Strung · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Hill Jr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-05-30 · Well Strung · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Avraham Amram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-05-18 · Rogers · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Berkowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
63.3%
19W–11L · 53.1% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
60.7%
17W–11L · 53.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova