← Search

Mia Dozier

Waldorf, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
166 matches · 86W–80L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Mia Dozier to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history166 matches
L
2026-07-25 · Net Girlz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janaya Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-19 · Net Girlz · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mia Piansay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-28 · Net Girlz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrea Motley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-4
L
2026-06-26 · Net Girlz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janaya Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-05 · Queens of the Court · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · Queens of the Court · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Rawls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Tracy Walls / Schaun Morgan
2026-04-25 · #1 Doubles · with Tamara Davis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · with Tamara Davis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · with Tamara Davis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-03-28 · LoVV · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-3
W
2026-01-31 · LoVV · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claris Brock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-12-07 · LoVV 6.5 Combo · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Constance Manning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
40%
2W–3L · 51% of games
3.0
75%
21W–7L · 56.2% of games
3.5
45.5%
30W–36L · 48.1% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 70.1% of games
6.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 53.3% of games
7.0
58.8%
10W–7L · 57% of games
7.5
0%
0W–6L · 33.6% of games
3.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 40.4% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
35 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova