← Search

Katie Boroski

— year-end
102 matches · 68W–34L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Katie Boroski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history102 matches
W
Abby Moore / Sarah Lynch
2026-06-10 · Indy A40 4.5W LCHS Hawkins · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Liane Hulka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-08 · Indy A18 4.5W LCHS Hawkins · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katelyn Hale Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-03 · Indy A40 4.5W LCHS Hawkins · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tara Schetzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-11 · Indy A18 4.5W LCHS Hawkins · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katelyn Hale Riley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
Jenna Patton / Courtney Petesch
2026-03-01 · Indy A18 4.5W IHP Hawkins · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zoy Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-08 · Indy A18 4.5W IHP Hawkins · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-11-09 · CIN A40 4.5W IRCD Fry · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Denise Fry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-10-19 · CIN A40 4.5W IRCD Fry · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Denise Fry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-10-05 · CIN A40 4.5W IRCD Fry · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tracy Cardillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-5, 1-0
L
2025-09-21 · CIN A40 4.5W IRCD Fry · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Denise Fry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Burkhardt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-08-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Burkhardt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
Teams9 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
80%
4W–1L · 62% of games
4.5
67.6%
50W–24L · 55.5% of games
5.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 59% of games
8.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 55.3% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
11 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova