← Search

Nancy Sobecks

— year-end
145 matches · 46W–99L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nancy Sobecks to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history145 matches
W
2026-07-11 · A18 3.5W CC2 Novick · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-09 · A18 3.5W CC2 Novick · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-30 · A40 3.5W CC Schaefer · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-16 · A40 3.5W CC Schaefer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Chase
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-11 · A18 3.5W CC2 Novick · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-21 · A18 3.5W CC2 Novick · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Freund
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-19 · A40 3.5W CC Schaefer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cheryl Chase
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-26 · A18 3.5W CC2 Novick · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
Jennifer Smith / Amy Grace
2026-03-21 · Low Tri W CC Butler · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carla Greenwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-20 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-28 · Low Tri W CC Butler · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Danielle Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-27 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Darcie Hansen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
35.2%
25W–46L · 45.3% of games
4.0
7.1%
2W–26L · 32.6% of games
6.5
35.3%
6W–11L · 43.9% of games
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.2% of games
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.7% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 38% of the time
#1 Singles
38%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
23 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
14 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert