← Search

Cheryl Chase

Brecksville, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
158 matches · 65W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cheryl Chase to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history158 matches
L
2026-06-16 · A40 3.5W CC Schaefer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Sobecks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-26 · A40 3.5W CC Schaefer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-19 · A40 3.5W CC Schaefer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Sobecks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-07 · Low Tri W CC Butler · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Evans
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-21 · Low Tri W CC Butler · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Erin Hubbard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-07-21 · A40 4.5W CC Maleski · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-15 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-07 · A40 4.5W CC Maleski · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-06-26 · A40 4.0W 1 CC1 Jones · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-06-17 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-16 · A40 4.5W CC Maleski · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-06-10 · A18 4.0W CC Garson · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
25%
1W–3L · 44.3% of games
3.5
61.7%
29W–18L · 57.2% of games
4.0
20.7%
12W–46L · 34.5% of games
4.5
0%
0W–5L · 22.8% of games
6.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.3% of games
7.5
50%
8W–8L · 52.4% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 64.3% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
26 matches
#2 Singles
10%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert