← Search

Manisha Degaonkar

— year-end
275 matches · 94W–181L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Manisha Degaonkar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history275 matches
W
N/A
2026-06-17 · GK Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Muenster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-16 · Drop Shots · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sue Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-03 · GK Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Retik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-28 · MSU: ACES · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
Sunita Subramanian / Deanne Dixson
2026-05-26 · GK Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cecilia Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-05-21 · MSU: ACES · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · Drop Shots · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Devico
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-13 · GK Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Devico
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · MSU: ACES · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-4
L
2026-05-06 · GK Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Earnecia Hasben-Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
Albina Zakrevski
2026-05-05 · GK Net Assets · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6
L
2026-05-02 · Drop Shots · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Earnecia Hasben-Powers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Teams50 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
45.8%
11W–13L · 49.6% of games
3.5
33.5%
72W–143L · 43.9% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
30.8%
8W–18L · 42% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
39 matches
#2 Singles
7%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer