← Search

Catherine DeSouza

Charlottesville, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 52W–27L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Catherine DeSouza to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
L
2026-09-09 · ACAC - DeSouza · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karin Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · ACAC - Bayliss · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsay Bazydlo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-12 · ACAC - Bayliss · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Hertel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-29 · ACAC - Bayliss · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Hertel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-20 · ACAC - Hertel · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Moren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-13 · ACAC - Hertel · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · ACAC - Hertel · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-3
L
2026-06-16 · ACAC - Hertel · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-11 · ACAC - Hertel · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-09 · ACAC - Hertel · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-02 · ACAC - Hertel · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-05-19 · ACAC - Hertel · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
70.3%
26W–11L · 58% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
100%
10W–0L · 67.2% of games
7.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 67.6% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 45.2% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 51.7% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
15 matches
#1 Singles
10%
8 matches
#2 Singles
8%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer