← Search

Elizabeth McManus

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
223 matches · 126W–97L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth McManus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history223 matches
L
2026-05-21 · CLUB RIDGES · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jenny Penesa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-14 · CLUB RIDGES · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rozanne Meservey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-07 · CLUB RIDGES · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marcy Saxe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-04 · RED ROCK CC #3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Chudd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-30 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine LaBarre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-27 · RED ROCK CC #3 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Claire Oraee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-23 · CLUB RIDGES · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tracie Chang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-20 · RED ROCK CC #3 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Unglaub
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-23 · RED ROCK CC #3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-09 · RED ROCK CC #3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Ashcraft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-07 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Pauli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-02 · RED ROCK CC #3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Chudd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
57.5%
104W–77L · 53.5% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
59.4%
19W–13L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
36 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
28 matches
#1 Singles
9%
19 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert