← Search

Christine LaBarre

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
264 matches · 166W–98L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Christine LaBarre to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history264 matches
W
Emily Beckmann / Danielle Krawl
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Moon-Hui Choi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Kim Knotts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Raedene Counts / Courtney Long
2026-07-29 · TPC · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Yamane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-08 · TPC · #2 Female Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Sager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Moon-Hui Choi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Genesis Garcia / Jocelyn Herman
2026-06-16 · #3 Doubles · with Kara Gaston championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · DTC #3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Moon-Hui Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-05-22 · DTC #2 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Consuelo Kinahan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · SPANISH TRAIL #2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Dalby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-15 · DTC #2 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Janelle Wells
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-09 · DTC #3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kara Gaston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-02 · DTC #3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kara Gaston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 65.9% of games
3.0
61.9%
104W–64L · 54.7% of games
3.5
46.2%
12W–14L · 49% of games
6.0
76%
19W–6L · 62.5% of games
7.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 52.6% of games
5.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
97 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
75 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
60 matches
#2 Female Doubles
6%
16 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
6 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer