← Search

Casey Thomas

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 94W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Casey Thomas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
L
2026-08-25 · WP-G PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jonathan Kosares mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-23 · WP-G PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Benjamin Albright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-08-18 · CACM RED · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-04 · CACM RED · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-3
W
2026-07-28 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · CACM RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-14 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · WP-G PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Benjamin Albright mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-07 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-05 · WP GREEN · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Antonio Vigil mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-30 · CACM BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
65.4%
34W–18L · 56.7% of games
4.0
50%
7W–7L · 47.7% of games
7.0mixed
80%
24W–6L · 60.5% of games
7.5mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 56.2% of games
8.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 57.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
23 matches
#1 Singles
16%
22 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova