← Search

ARTHUR VAUGHN

Aurora, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
134 matches · 84W–50L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add ARTHUR VAUGHN to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
L
2026-08-23 · CACM BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leslie Greer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-08-18 · CACM NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Hampel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-16 · CACM BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jodi Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · CACM BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Boes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-02 · CACM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Boes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-02 · CACM YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-27 · CACM YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Cuevas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · CACM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leslie Greer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · CACM BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Boes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-07 · CACM RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Sloane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-05 · CACM ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephanie Baur mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-30 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Gralla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
82.1%
23W–5L · 66.9% of games
3.5
53.1%
26W–23L · 52.4% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 55.6% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 64.4% of games
6.5mixed
75%
6W–2L · 54.8% of games
7.0mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 57.8% of games
7.5mixed
50%
7W–7L · 49.2% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
32 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova