Rachel Lund
113 matches · 60W–53L · seasons 2022–2026
Captains: add Rachel Lund to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history113 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
N/A
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
N/A
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Teams70 teams · 2021–2027
Bartz 4.0 40+ ES27
All About That Baisch
Ament: Double Trouble
Baisch, Please
Bartz 4.0 40+ ES26
Bartz 4.0 40+ Summer26
Bartz 4.0 40+ Winter 26
Bartz/Lund Mixed One Doubles
Bartz/Tollefson 8.0 Fireballers
Bartz/Tollefson 8.0 Fireballers 18+
Bartz/Tollefson Mix It Up 8.0 ES 2026
Basic Baisch
LT Eden Prairie Elsass 11:00am
Lund/Bartz Blazing Paces 4.0 Day
Ostlund 8.0 40+ S26
Ostlund: PERfect In Pink ES26
PERfect In Pink S26
PERfect In Pink W26
REILING-STOUT 18+ Winter
REILING-STOUT SUMMER 18s
Reiling-Stout ES 18+
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
25%
2W–6L · 47.1% of games
3.5
77.3%
17W–5L · 61.9% of games
4.0
41.9%
13W–18L · 46.5% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
73.1%
19W–7L · 59.2% of games
8.0mixed
42.1%
8W–11L · 49.4% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
25 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches
#5 Singles
5%
6 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
4%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.