← Search

Austin Seaverson

Saint Paul, MN
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
34 matches · 13W–21L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Austin Seaverson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history34 matches
W
2026-07-19 · Ewen/Summer26 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angel Chandler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-15 · Swanson/Tatge 2k26 Summer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Stingley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · Swanson/Tatge 2k26 Summer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Larson Ringlien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-06-26 · Ostlund 8.0 40+ S26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Rachel Lund mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-24 · Swanson/Tatge 2k26 Summer · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-21 · Ewen/Summer26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angel Chandler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-14 · Ewen/Summer26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angel Chandler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-10 · Swanson/Tatge 2k26 Summer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Trace Combs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-03 · Swanson/Tatge 2k26 Summer · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-27 · Swanson/Tatge 2k26 Summer · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Stingley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-22 · Ostlund 8.0 40+ S26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michele Zens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-17 · Ewen/Summer26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Angel Chandler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
36.4%
8W–14L · 46.3% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.7% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
9 matches
#1 Singles
24%
8 matches
#2 Singles
9%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer