← Search

Angelina Neiberger

Cary, NC
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
33 matches · 17W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Angelina Neiberger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history33 matches
L
2026-03-29 · El.Hodges18A · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-23 · SBurkert-HVCC · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-22 · El.Hodges18A · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-02 · SBurkert-HVCC · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-11-14 · #1 Doubles · with Anastasiya Manet championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-14 · #2 Doubles · with Anastasiya Manet championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-08-31 · He.Remley18C · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Leslie Boesch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-24 · He.Remley18C · #1 Doubles · 9.5 · with Anastasiya Manet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
Phillip Cardella / Laura Alvarez
2025-08-03 · Co.Wilkins18M · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Connor Wilkins mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-06-14 · #1 Doubles · with Madeline Brown championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Laura Alvarez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Laura Alvarez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.0
46.7%
7W–8L · 46.5% of games
9.5
100%
5W–0L · 56.1% of games
10.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
8 matches
#1 Singles
21%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
4 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova