← Search

Paula Collado Cordon

Durham, NC
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 64W–56L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Paula Collado Cordon to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-08-26 · Da.Wilder18S · #2 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-16 · Ma.Jackson18C · #2 Doubles · 9.5 · with Paulina Fernanda Delgado Andrade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-29 · TOC.Jackson · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · Ne.Day18M · #2 Doubles · 10.0 · with Phillip Cardella mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · Ne.Marks18T · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Paula Fernandez-Pita
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-15 · TOC.Wilder · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Jason Hull mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · Ne.Marks18T · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nena Marks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Christa Hataway / AnneMarie Kimball
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Heather Remley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Melissa Thieke / Madison Cook
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Anastasiya Manet championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-08 · TOC.Jackson · #2 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-28 · Ne.Day18M · #1 Doubles · 10.0 · with Andrew Perdue mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-27 · Ne.Marks18T · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Anastasiya Manet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 67.5% of games
5.0
38.5%
15W–24L · 48% of games
8.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 62.8% of games
9.5
66.7%
12W–6L · 56.3% of games
0.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 46.7% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 54.6% of games
9.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
14 matches
#1 Singles
10%
12 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches
#3 Singles
4%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer