← Search

Karen Nicholson

— year-end
163 matches · 105W–58L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Karen Nicholson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history163 matches
L
2026-08-29 · LWR Boylston Trilevel · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Stadelnikas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
Erin White / Jackie Lester
2026-08-04 · LWR Combositos 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · LWR Liquid Ranchers · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kim Eck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-16 · LWR Liquid Ranchers · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Diana Stadelnikas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-11 · LWR Boylston Trilevel · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-09 · LWR Liquid Ranchers · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nia Esposito
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-07 · LWR Combositos 3.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marcia Frost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Barbara Cogen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · LWR Esposito · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Cogen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-05 · LWR McAloon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Goelz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-02 · LWR Esposito · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-14 · LWR McAloon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barbara Cogen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams63 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
73%
46W–17L · 57.1% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
93.8%
15W–1L · 72.6% of games
8.0
70.3%
26W–11L · 57.9% of games
8.5
50%
13W–13L · 52.1% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
48 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match
#2 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova