← Search

Kathryn Paige Ciano

Sarasota, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
160 matches · 106W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kathryn Paige Ciano to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history160 matches
W
2026-08-29 · Payne Park Sziksai · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · Payne Park Sziksai 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rebecca Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-22 · Payne Park Sziksai · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Nathan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · Payne Park Sziksai · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Xylena Simone Sziksai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Taylor Greene / Jacqueline Dezelski
2026-08-12 · Payne Park Sziksai 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marina Yeliseyev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-29 · Payne Park Sziksai 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Tina Beres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · Wild Blue Wild Cards · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Gill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-15 · Payne Park Sziksai 7.5 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Marina Yeliseyev
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · Wild Blue Wild Cards · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sue Silberbusch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-29 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · Wild Blue Mixed · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carl Janglin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-13 · Wild Blue Spring Chicks · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
90.5%
19W–2L · 70% of games
4.0
61.5%
56W–35L · 55.9% of games
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 37.2% of games
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 61.5% of games
7.5
60%
18W–12L · 51.4% of games
8.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
37 matches
#2 Singles
20%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe