← Search

Catherine Bradley

Iowa City, IA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 29W–35L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Catherine Bradley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-05-16 · Betts & Hooley: HTRC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-18 · Bradley & Heffernan: HTRC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-11 · Betts & Hooley: HTRC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-04 · Bradley & Heffernan: HTRC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-29 · Drake · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Schadler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-14 · Betts & Hooley: HTRC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-02-08 · Drake · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bryan Goettel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-07 · Bradley & Heffernan: HTRC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-10 · Betts & Hooley: HTRC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-12-20 · Cram: HTRC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-12-06 · IA/Bradley-Heffernan/40&Over3.5W · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-11-16 · Goins/Milavetz · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michaele Benn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
50%
5W–5L · 43.6% of games
3.5
56%
14W–11L · 55.4% of games
4.0
23.8%
5W–16L · 39.9% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 55.3% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#2 Singles
13%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
6%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King