← Search

Michaele Benn

— year-end
171 matches · 73W–98L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michaele Benn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history171 matches
L
2026-05-28 · Racquettes · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melinda Parsons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-07 · Racquettes · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimerlee Conner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · Goins/Wasta · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Diane Reinsch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-04-18 · Smith & Schlabach: NDAC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheila Schlabach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-09 · Racquettes · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marlo Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-04-02 · Racquettes · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimerlee Conner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · Goins/Milavetz · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robin Sueppel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-22 · Goins/Milavetz · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Conrad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-21 · Bradley & Heffernan: HTRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Conrad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-01-24 · Bradley & Heffernan: HTRC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Conrad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-01-17 · Smith & Schlabach: NDAC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Hightshoe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2025-11-16 · Goins/Milavetz · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Teams46 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
46.9%
38W–43L · 47.9% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
38.7%
29W–46L · 46.2% of games
8.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 33% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
49 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert