← Search

Lisa Erickson

— year-end
134 matches · 67W–67L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Erickson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history134 matches
W
2026-06-21 · Jensen, Jacqui · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandi Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · Jensen, Jacqui · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nora Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-19 · Jensen, Jacqui · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sandi Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-5
W
2026-02-22 · Dunaway, Pam · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-20 · Jensen, Patty · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Carlson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-02-08 · Dunaway, Pam · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Strahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-02 · Jensen, Patty · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Gatti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-01 · Dunaway, Pam · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Dunaway
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-01-11 · Dunaway, Pam · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Hagen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-12-14 · Dunaway, Pam · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irene Caballero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
Delane Cohen / Anne Miller
2025-12-01 · Jensen, Patty · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angel Krishna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2025-11-17 · Jensen, Patty · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Ackerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Teams33 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
47.9%
57W–62L · 47.2% of games
7.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 53.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer