← Search

Leslie Stelzer

— year-end
157 matches · 66W–91L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Leslie Stelzer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history157 matches
W
2026-05-08 · Lagerstrom, Claudia · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristine Schrock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-04-24 · Lagerstrom, Claudia · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Claudia Lagerstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Andrea Root / Tricia Boushka
2026-04-15 · Nelson, Cydney · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Shore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-12 · Lagerstrom, Claudia · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Manion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-04 · Lagerstrom, Claudia · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Natalie Atwater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-15 · North, Laura · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Thornton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-08 · North, Laura · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Thornton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · North, Laura · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Thornton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-01 · North, Laura · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Thornton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-01-25 · North, Laura · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristine Schrock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-01-18 · North, Laura · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Thornton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-12-14 · North, Laura · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hildegard McManus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Teams35 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
56%
14W–11L · 58.3% of games
4.0
32.2%
28W–59L · 42.7% of games
7.0
68.2%
15W–7L · 58.8% of games
8.0
39.1%
9W–14L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
40 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova