← Search

Edward Gaela

Fort Lauderdale, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 15W–35L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Edward Gaela to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
2026-08-27 · Ltc/Forman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carlton Kirby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-13 · Ltc/Forman · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Gonzalez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-04 · Ltc/Miller · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-02 · Ltc/Barber · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gaetano Arcuri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-23 · Ltc/Barber · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Phillip Dunlap
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-09 · Ltc/Barber · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carlton Kirby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-02-02 · Ltc/Barber · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shaun Dubash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-26 · Ltc/Barber · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael G Salmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-01-19 · Ltc/Barber · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yury Ashkinadze
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-14 · Ltc/Miller · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Kuharske
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-15 · Dillon/Tichacek · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Wendy Calvet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-03-17 · Broward/Barber/40&Over3.0M · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenneth Croft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 42.8% of games
3.5
23.8%
5W–16L · 36.8% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 44.3% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.5% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer