← Search

Bryce Farrell

Binghamton, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
15 matches · 7W–8L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Bryce Farrell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history15 matches
W
2026-02-22 · Haray · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica Haray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-02-01 · Haray · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Worden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-05-04 · Haray · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laure Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-27 · Haray · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Yuhnick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-03-08 · Haray · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laure Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2024-02-18 · Haray · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Small
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-01-21 · Haray · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Small
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2023-06-29 · Simply Smashing · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2023-06-15 · Simply Smashing · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2023-06-08 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Spottek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2023-06-01 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with MacKenzie Rounds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2023-05-18 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with MacKenzie Rounds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.7% of games
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 47% of the time
#2 Doubles
47%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
3 matches
#2 Singles
20%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer