← Search

Amanda Spottek

Binghamton, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
182 matches · 104W–78L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amanda Spottek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history182 matches
L
2026-07-09 · Baseline bandits · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ewelina Zajac-Holdrege
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Baseline bandits · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ewelina Zajac-Holdrege
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-11 · Baseline bandits · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-04 · Baseline bandits · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristen Starke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-12 · Spottek Silver · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Hackford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · Spottek Silver · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Sladish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-15 · Spottek Silver · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Sladish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Asif Saifullah mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-07 · Spottek Silver · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Sladish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-15 · Spottek Silver · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Porterfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leo O'Connor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-02-01 · Spottek Silver · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Vail
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
79.2%
19W–5L · 60.8% of games
3.5
62.7%
32W–19L · 53.2% of games
4.0
41.2%
14W–20L · 44.1% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 52.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
14W–14L · 49.9% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
61 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
39 matches
#1 Singles
14%
25 matches
#2 Singles
4%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal